Download Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Full Version Free
We are looking to improve your experience on the Visual Studio Blog. It would be very helpful if you could share your feedback via this that should take less than 2 minutes. Today we have several releases to talk about: there’s the release of Visual Studio 2017 version 15.3, the release of.NET Core 2.0, and a release of Visual Studio for Mac version 7.1.
- Download Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Full Version Free
- Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Full Version Free Download For Windows 7
- Free Download Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Express Full Version
We’ll talk about them briefly in that order, but as always, there’s a lot more information in the release notes for each product. If you’d like to jump right in, and. You can also access the latest Visual Studio 2017 product releases through an where we offer the recommended installation of the most popular workloads and components. Visual Studio 2017 version 15.3 For Visual Studio 2017 version 15.3, we focused on improving accessibility, particularly using Visual Studio with the most popular screen readers. We made over 1,700 improvements and still have some work to do, but if you are using Visual Studio 2017 in a low-vision or no-vision mode, a lot has improved. On everything we’ve done and what’s more to come, but here I’ll call out a couple of the more major things we’ve improved. Debugging is much more accessible.
Debugger windows like the Call Stack, Locals, Autos, and Watch windows were inaccessible to screen readers. That’s now fixed. The VS editor’s text adornments let developers know about features available at particular points on a line of code, such as breakpoints, lightbulbs, and error and warning “squiggles.” Customers can now discover and navigate between these adornments via the new “Show Line Annotations” command set, which you can find on the editor context menu. In addition to accessibility, we have many fixes for reliability issues to improve performance, many of which you reported through report-a-problem. Here are some of the more notable ones that had high votes that we fixed:. A crash that could occur in C# and VB projects when editing linked files, files in Shared Projects, or files used in projects targeting multiple runtimes.
A race condition when debugging C# or VB projects that could cause Visual Studio to crash when ending the debugging session. A crash in C# or VB projects when malformed metadata is encountered in the code file. A crash that could occur when compiling a local function in C#. We also improved many other experiences:.
Azure Functions Support. We added the tools for developing C# Azure Functions to the “Azure development” workload. The main feature change is that this update enables you to create pre-compiled C# Azure Functions, which start faster than script-based functions.
For details see the. Broad Azure sign-in support. VS 2017 15.3 also supports logging into not just Azure, but Azure Government and Sovereign cloud offerings, and Azure Stack.
Improved container support. This release now supports the breadth of container development across existing.NET Framework apps with Windows Containers, to.NET Core with Windows, and Linux Support. Recent additions include support for your.NET Core applications in containers running Nano Server, as well as debugging improvements for.NET Framework applications in containers. Continuous Delivery Tools now included. We’ve moved the Continuous Deliver tools extension into the main product. You can configure continuous delivery for ASP.NET and ASP.NET Core projects targeting Azure App Service.
This tooling will configure your continuous integration build using Visual Studio Team Services and configure your deployment to Azure App Service. Once configured, you can modify and extend the build and deploy process, customizing it to meet your exact needs. For the full list of improvements check out the.NET Core 2.0 Released.NET Core 2.0 is also released today. This is the second major version of.NET Core and this release focuses on performance improvements and expanding the set of APIs available via.NET Standard 2.0. It includes the runtime and libraries for.NET Core as well as the tools for building, debugging and running.NET Core applications.
There are some notable changes from.NET Core 1.1. There’s a full, but here are some highlights:. Live Unit Testing. You can use Live Unit Testing for.NET Standard,.NET Core, and ASP.NET Core projects. (Visual Studio Enterprise SKU only). References. You can now refer to.NET Core/.NET Standard libraries from.NET Framework projects and vice versa.
No need to manually add interop NuGet packages – Visual Studio does this for you automatically. Containers with.NET Core and Nano Server. Support for containerizing ASP.NET Core apps as Nano Server images has been added and you can now select Nano Server as the container platform. You can do this under File-New Project for ASP.NET Core projects. For your existing projects, it can be added using the Project Context Menu. Support in Visual Studio for Mac.
VS for Mac supports building.NET Core 2.0 applications, including libraries, console apps, as well as web applications and services with ASP.NET Core. Note that the.NET Core 2.0 SDK needs to be installed via a separate download to enable.NET Core 2.0 development in Visual Studio 2017 version 15.3. You can get it. Visual Studio enables side-by-side support of multiple.NET Core SDKs.
This also means you can experiment with the latest daily build of the.NET Core SDK, while also developing with the latest public releases. Watch the.NET team demonstrate the new features of.NET Core, Visual Studio 2017 and Visual Studio for Mac! Learn what’s new and how to use the new tools. Visual Studio for Mac version 7.1 Visual Studio for Mac version 7.1 is also available today.
It adds support for.NET Core 2.0 targeting in console apps, web apps, and web services. It also enables creating.NET Standard 2.0 in library projects, to share more code across projects. Like Visual Studio 2017, a lot of the improvements in this update center on reliability. We’ve made strides in decreased memory usage, better performance, and decreased crashes. Many of these fixes have been made possibly by your feedback, so please keep that coming through the. Share Your Feedback As always, we welcome your thoughts and concerns.
For issues, let us know via the tool in Visual Studio. You’ll be able to track your issues in the where you can ask questions and find answers. For suggestions, share with us through. John Montgomery, Director of Program Management for Visual Studio John is responsible for product design and customer success for all of Visual Studio, C, C#, VB, JavaScript, and.NET. John has been at Microsoft for 17 years, working in developer technologies the whole time. I used Apps and Features to uninstall each of the older SDK MSIs.
Global.json files were added manually to the root of the solution folder or source control repository. If you are struggling to find one, you may not have one. I have no idea which project templates automatically add global.json files (if any).
Plenty of resources on the net about the topic though. Honestly, since posting this earlier today, I’ve had a hard time getting VS2017.3 to consistently build my project.
Often hitting build or run, Visual studio shows the build as running (you can cancel the build off the build menu) but nothing ever appears in the output window. I would say that the instructions above got my solution to successfully load but that is only part of the story for resolving this for my team.
If anyone has instructions for getting back to 2017.2 I’d love a link please! I didn’t know there was a “dotnet core 1.0.4” out – I ended up having to update the project to dotnet core 2.0 – which by the way still wasn’t as easy as installing the SDK – I had to remove ALL of my package references, and replace it with just the one “microsoft.aspnetcore.all” package (or whatever the exact name is).
You can’t just go into the package manager and click the “Upgrade” button next to your packages – it errors saying they are not compatible! Would be really nice if there was documentation on how to upgrade existing projects. I’m going to have to make sure my work systems DO NOT UPDATE as we can’t afford to mass-upgrade the projects to 2.0 at this time. Again VC 2017 15.3 DOES NOT PLAY WELL with dotnet core 1! Hi: Our dev team would like to investigate and see what is going on.
For that we need a trace. When VS is in a bad state, launch the “Send Feedback” tool, either in the bad VS or another instance by clicking the “Send Feedback” icon present at the top right corner of VS and choosing “Report a Problem” icon and then following along with the wizard walk thru. Please let us know after you have done that so that we can look at the trace. If your repo is publicly sharable, even better, and please do share with me. After installing, Visual Studio won’t run.
It tells me setup is not complete and to run the installer again. I did, and it didn’t say anything was wrong. So, I selected repair. A few seconds in, there was an error.
I’m now afraid to install 2017 updates on my work machine. Here is the log.
I’m seeing the same issue here too. VS was working fine on Friday but this morning (Monday) it won’t load telling me that ‘The setup for this installation of Visual Studio is not complete. Please run the Visual Studio Installer again to correct the issue.’. Microsoft: How do I downgrade back to 15.2?
I am having major problems with 15.3. I installed the update. Now it keeps giving me an unrecoverable error when I load up my.NET Framework projects and exits. I tried doing a repair and then an uninstall and reinstall and the problem persists. I also tried doing a system restore from about a week ago. I couldn’t get Visual Studio to even open when I did that. Now, I undid the system restore.
I am dead in the water. I want to downgrade back to 15.2. Where do I get the installer for 15.2? The following is the error I’m getting. I can’t do anything until I get this resolved. How do I revert back to the old version?
Application: devenv.exe Framework Version: v4.0.30319 Description: The application requested process termination through System.Environment.FailFast(string message). Message: System.InvalidOperationException: This operation cannot be performed on a default instance of ImmutableArray.
Download Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Full Version Free

Consider initializing the array, or checking the ImmutableArray.IsDefault property. However, Visual Studio fails and exits on me before I can do anything. It appears to do it for any project. Even for newly created simple projects such as a hello world console application. The only thing I’ve been able to get to work is going back to 15.0.
However, I’ve been using.NET Framework 4.7 and support for that wasn’t added until 15.1. As far as I know, there is no way to update 15.0 without having it update all the way to 15.3. Microsoft: please provide an installer for 15.2. You have the 15.3 installer on MSDN. Why no publish the installers for 15.1 and 15.2? I’m stuck and cannot do any work until I get this resolved.
If I go back to 15.0. Georgia drivers license hologram. Then, I get to go through the fun of having to downgrade all my projects of which there are many back to an older version of.NET Framework and then have to deal with the mess that that will cause with NuGet hell.
I found a workaround for the debugger issue because it was seriously impacting my ability to work, too. Go into Tools Options Environment General. Uncheck “Automatically adjust visual experience based on client performance” and uncheck “Use hardware graphics acceleration if available”. In my experience, it is unfortunately very frequently a fix for all kinds of display crash bugs in Visual Studio. Previously I’ve only encountered them with the WPF designer and a couple of other designers. VS 2017 has been working so well with it checked for months that I almost forgot I’d checked it again. But it was my go-to culprit when I started getting crashes in my debugger when trying to use the hover debug tools and I saw missing glyphs and corrupted UI.
I would +1 an option to go back to 15.2. A solution that compiles and runs just fine in 15.2 is broken in 15.3: System.IO.FileLoadException: ‘Could not load file or assembly ‘System.Net.Http, Version=4.1.1.1, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a’ or one of its dependencies. The located assembly’s manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)’ Lots of broken assembly references, but nothing in the project structure has changed – just the upgrade to 15.3. Since I can’t go back to 15.2, I’m dead in the water until I get to the root cause. Setup operation failed Log information: Package ‘Microsoft.VisualStudio.WebDeploy.Msi,version=15.0.26711.1,chip=x64’ failed to install. Search URL Details MSI: C: ProgramData Microsoft VisualStudio Packages Microsoft.VisualStudio.WebDeploy.Msi,version=15.0.26711.1,chip=x64 webdeployx64.msi, Properties: REBOOT=ReallySuppress Return code: 30001 Return code details: Setup failed to detect shared configuration.
Hi, my C application builds fine (Debug mode) with 15.3, but crashes as soon as I start it with the error: Exception thrown at 0x017DDCB9 in myapp.exe: 0xC00000FD: Stack overflow (parameters: 0x00000000, 0x01C52000). Going deeper, I see that the main thread crashes in the function allocaprobe, called at the very beginning of my constructor. 011C24A0 push ebp 011C24A1 mov ebp,esp 011C24A3 push 0FFFFFFFFh 011C24A5 push 1842E36h 011C24AA mov eax,dword ptr fs:00000000h 011C24B0 push eax 011C24B1 mov eax,251FD10h 011C24B6 call allocaprobe (010831ECh). Hi Cyril, I’m just a casual observer, but there are a couple of things about your question. You say you alloca in a constructor. Alloca is on the stack right, not the heap.
You also sometimes say objects and sometimes say pointers. It might just be a clarification needed in your post.
Of course that doesn’t explain why it is 37MB vs 12K but it does rather sound like you are allocating objects not pointers. Print out the value you are passing to alloca. And if it is in a constructor, remember, that memory is going to disappear as soon as the ctor scope exits. It isn’t on the heap. I assume you know what you are doing if you are using alloca but even the best of us make mistakes.
It is also possible that the language semantics may have subtly changed between versions, so really worth checking exactly how many bytes you are asking for. Is there someplace which explains all the interrelationships of the.NETs across different project types and builds?
Strictly for example, UWP seems to use.NET Core for Debug and then.NET Native(?) for Release. That’s something I had to stumble upon learning. Then I later stumbled upon learning that some.NET Core APIs can run faster, and even significantly faster, than their.NET Native counterparts. However UWP apps released through the Store must be.NET Native(?) and NOT.NET Core. So this creates the VERY UNUSUAL concept of an app possibly actually running faster under a Debug build than its final Release build. Let’s face it, that is NOT something a developer would normally expect to happen.
But my question isn’t about the details I’ve mentioned. It’s about a “bigger picture” explanation of the.NET interrelationships across project types and builds so that I can stuff my brain with the knowledge it needs to better guestimate why some bug, quirk, etc, might be popping up in an app. That would be far better than my “stumbling upon learning” something important that would have been far better to plan for earlier in the development cycle. I just hope you aren’t the person responsible for the 640MB PDF reader in the Windows Store That was a joke, I’m sure you aren’t. The build variants certainly are complex at this point that is for sure. Maybe this is why this post is so chock full of issues, I don’t envy the VS team having to keep on top of all this stuff, it is insane. I spent a good few hours recently understanding the versioning schemes for.Net and I agree, it really isn’t pretty.
At least I couldn’t find a central page that competently describes all the variations. I thought the idea of.Net was one framework that runs everywhere. Need to keep a track on that ball.
Currently The definition of.Net is looking more similar to a quantum wave packet. We used VS 2017 v15.2 to write some R codes. Everything is OK and the performance of editing code in R interactive is perfect. We upgraded VS from v15.2 to v15.3 yesterday, and the speed of typing R code in R interactive became some slowly, it always takes about 2 or more seconds to show the intellisense panel. The same thing also happened when trying to edit a R code file. I had tried in several physical machines, and all machines installed the v15.3 have the same issue, while the machines with v15.2 are OK.
We even try the way to uninstall the components related to R and reinstall it again, but nothing happened. So we are wondering whether there is some change which has confliction with the R tools Please kindly let us know if there are some tips to solve this issue. We definitely need a way to get back to 15.2. As it is today, 15.3 is completely broken. So broken, my team can’t continue using it. We NEED a way to get back to 15.2.
The first thing that hits you after upgrading is how absurdly slow it is. At first we thought it could be some incompatibility with ReSharper, but for once ReSharper was innocent. I tried stripping VS down to only the web development tools and using professional instead of enterprise.
Nope, this thing is slow. The second thing is that it goes crazy with the references.
Our project is an ASP.NET Core 1.1 app running on.NET 4.6.2. Some assemblies references.NET Standard 1.6.1 and the references brought in by this NuGet package gets screwed up. VS marks them with yellow triangles and claim they can’t be found. It does build though and the assemblies it “can’t find” are brought in to the bin folder. Although it brings in the.NET Standard 2.0 version.
Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Full Version Free Download For Windows 7
For example System.Runtime is referenced as 4.1.1 (4.3.0) from the NuGet package and the app.config has been updated by NuGet/VS to with binding redirects for 4.1.1. Although when VS/msbuild builds it brings in 4.1.2 and we have a runtime error. We can make it run by updating the app.configs to redirect to the versions in.net standard 2.0, but why does this happen.
We have tried with SDK 1.1.0 and 1.0.4 in global.json, but the behavior is the same. We need to go back to 15.2. Note that when I talk about app.config, that is in our unit test projects.
The web application itself runs, but the unit tests fail with can’t load assemblies. Unless we update the binding redirects with the wrong versions, the ones we don’t reference, our test projects fail to run. We had to use ilspy to get the version to use in the app.config. The csproj says 4.1.1 and the app.config said 4.1.1. The file on the other end of the hint path is 4.1.1, but he one ending up in the bin folder is 4.1.2.
Afraid I’ll lose everything when I OK this “An exception has been encountered. This may be caused by an extension.” (not an extension, just typing, copy/paste, then BAM!) 1426 2017/08/17 23:34:40.867 Error Editor or Editor Extension System.ArgumentException: The collections refer to different snapshots. At Microsoft.VisualStudio.Text.NormalizedSnapshotSpanCollection.Overlap(NormalizedSnapshotSpanCollection left, NormalizedSnapshotSpanCollection right) at Microsoft.VisualStudio.UI.Text.Wpf.View.Implementation.Selection.HighContrast.HighContrastSelectionTagger.d17.MoveNext at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Text.Tagging.Implementation.TagAggregator`1.d39.MoveNext. The Pen support is broken and crashes VS randomly every few minutes, but I already posted about this on that issue ticket.
I fixed that by disabling pen support as suggested. Two more problems I am seeing though.

Free Download Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Express Full Version
1) The output window, error window etc seem to want to jump to all kinds of different docking locations. Even worse, source files open in the same docking areas as the output window tab groups for no apparent reason. I tried resetting the window layout lots of times but it still does it. I have to manually restock the status windows pretty much every time I restart VS.
2) I added a new project to an existing dotnetcore solution, then added references to two of the other assemblies in the project then tried to build. It couldn’t find one of the DLL’s. So I poked around in the SLN file and apparently the GUID for the newly added project didn’t match the old ones. I fixed it manually and then the project built. As I mentioned in that bug report, devenv.exe doesn’t say 15.3, it says 15.2.xxx.
It certainly isn’t “grammar.h” this time guys 😛 Looks like you have your hands full. Cheers from Amsterdam 🙂 -chris xxx. After the update, in many instances breakpoints will not be hit. The IDE reports that “The breakpoint will not currently be hit. The source code is different from the original version”. There is a workaround to force the breakpoint to be hit event when the sources are different, this was not the case prior to updating.
The application is simple asp.net core (.net core) webapi application, not using any special technique, migrated from 1.x to 2.0. The problem happens in multiple computers, all updated from VS15.2 to VS15.3. Cleaning and rebuilding has no effect. A couple of months ago we started to install Visual Studio 2017 from the downloads. After the installation many updates (with admin rights) where needed. After one week i recognized it was a preview release. And now, once again, not one word it is a preview release!
Why didn’t you mention it is a preview release? One thing which bothers me since I use.Net Core, is that you can not increment releases or patch releases. Everything release needs something like version-rc-number, or version-preview-number, or other strange numbering schemes, hope this get cleared once in the future, because I am fed up googling around to understand with what i work. Hi, As we know, there is a unavoidable trade-off between releasing a product regularly to reflect user needs vs.
Testing the product thoroughly and making it stable. It appears that the recent VS 2017 releases is notably sacrificing the product stability and usability due to continual releases.
Adding to this, the lack of off-line installer (of course there is “vscommunity.exe –layout” but is not as convenient and portable as an downlable ISO) and no support for downgrading! We are a team of C#/C developers and have been waiting for VS 2017 since first days of 2017. We have tried and enjoyed the new features in VS 2017 releases on a test workstation.
However, our team cannot switch to VS 2017 because of mentioned issues. I wonder how well VS 2017 is accepted and adopted internally among Microsoft teams. I hope the upcoming releases of Visual Studio focus more on the stability and reliability.
I am in the process of “updating” from 15.2 to 15.3 It’s now “updating” for more than 12 hours and it still shows only 82% “Acquiring Microsoft Visual Studio” but it is not stalled and continues to work. I have asked this question before and never got an answer (it is not the first time: what is the purpose of the blog if you refuse to anwer? Why waste your “customers” time?): why does it take more than 12hrs to update your product while all your competitors can do it in between 1mn and 5 mn? I have tried to think about all scenarios and can’t find any possible reason: a) your are hashing all the file of my computer: your built-in windows anti-virus already does that and there is no need to repeat it.
B) you are transmitting all our files to your servers: even if you would be doing this (which is probably what you are not doing though we are talking about Microsoft here, so anything is thinkable), it would not take that long given the computer we are using for this download sufficient big files. Given that your product is sub-par, it STILL does not c compliance no where at the level of your competitors, it is super slow to compile, etc, so they should in theory be less to donwload and install, I’ll repeat AGAIN my question: What is the reason that it takes 12 hours to install an UPDATE!!!!! Hi @programmer, thanks for the comment – and I’m sorry for your frustration with the updater. 12 hours is certainly far from the norm – not that it helps you, but average update times for this feature update are in the 10-20 minute range. Visual Studio is made up of hundreds of individual components: the core shell, Roslyn, language services, Windows SDKs, and other frameworks, tools and runtimes. At a high level, during the update we compare the component versions on your machine with the version in the manifest for the update and download any later versions. In parallel, we uninstall outdated components and install newer components that have been downloaded.
In short, the process is very similar to how most package managers operate. For the avoidance of doubt, we don’t hash all the files on your computer nor transfer downloaded components back to our servers. As to your machine, we’d need to look at the logs to figure out what’s going on. The logs are stored in the%TEMP% folder, and if you look for the most recent file named ddsetupTIMESTAMP.log, you’ll be able to see a blow-by-blow account of what it has been doing. My speculation is that you had difficulties downloading an updated component, whether because of internet issues or something else – but of course, that really is speculation.
If you see something that looks like a bug on our side, please feel free to file a feedback ticket using the Submit a Problem button in the title bar of the Visual Studio Installer, and someone will take a look. Lastly, I’m not an expert on C standards conformance, but I know the team has invested heavily in the latest releases and the Visual Studio 2017 compiler is now complete for features added in the C14 Standard, with significant improvements in C17 support in the 15.3 release.
More details here: Hopefully that helps a little – and apologies for your sub-par experience. Warm wishes, Tim Sneath Visual Studio Team.
. The Visual Studio 2010 and.NET Framework 4 Training Kit includes presentations, hands-on labs, and demos. This content is designed to help you learn how to utilize the Visual Studio 2010 features and a variety of framework technologies including:. C# 4.
Visual Basic 10. F#. Parallel Extensions. Windows Communication Foundation. Windows Workflow. Windows Presentation Foundation. Silverlight 4.
ASP.NET 4. Windows 7. Entity Framework. ADO.NET Data Services. Managed Extensibility Framework. Application Lifecycle Management. Windows Azure This version of the Training Kit works with Visual Studio 2010 and.NET Framework 4.